Last week the government announced 10 potential sites for a (fast-tracked) new generation of Nuclear Power stations (which was reffered to by Ed Milliband as ‘New Nuclear’) – these are:
- Braystones, Cumbria
- Kirksanton, Cumbria (UKs oldest Wind Farm to be replaced)
- Bradwell, Essex
- Hartlepool, County Durham
- Heysham, Lancashire
- Hinkley Point, Somerset
- Oldbury, Gloucestershire
- Sellafield, Cumbria
- Sizewell, Suffolk
- Wylfa, Anglesey
Obviously with a decison of this magnitude there has been widespread reaction and examination of what this means for the future of UK energy.
Helpfully, Reuters compiled some of the thoughts of leading energy industry figures:
Greg Clark, Conservative Energy Spokesman
“Every one of the measures contained in this statement should have been brought forward 10 years ago when they had the chance to secure the investments that are so desperately needed to keep the lights on, keep prices down and cut carbon emissions.”
Simon Hughes, Liberal Democrat Energy Spokesman
“A new generation of nuclear power stations will be a colossal mistake regardless of where they are built.
“New plants in the UK have never been built without massive cost to the taxpayer and a lethal legacy of toxic waste.”
Keith Parker, Chief Executive – Nuclear Industry Association
“This is a key step forward in the drive to de-carbonize our economy. A streamlined planning process will help the development of an array of low-carbon technologies, including nuclear, which in turn can do so much to combat climate change.”
Andy Duff, RWE NPOWER Chief Executive
“The closure of old coal and nuclear plant, and a likely return to growing demand in the next decade, means major modernization of the energy system is still needed.
“This will require billions of pounds of investment to tackle carbon dioxide emissions, keep the lights on and keep energy prices manageable.”
Adam Marshall, British Chambers of Commerce Policy Director
“Decisions involving nuclear power are never easy. Yet British business is clear that nuclear power will be a crucial part of a more sustainable future energy mix.
“A faster, more streamlined planning process is also required to safeguard the UK’s energy supply in the decades to come.”
Greenpeace Nuclear Campaign Head Ben Ayliffe
“Our lawyers will be examining this announcement very closely.
“You can’t justify building more nuclear power stations when there is no solution to radioactive waste and when international regulators are saying there are huge uncertainties surrounding the basic safety of new reactor designs.”
Stephen Hale, Director of The Green Alliance
“Nuclear power will always cost more and deliver less than its advocates claim.
“We require a national plan and locations for carbon capture and storage, not for nuclear power.”
There ws also an excellent article from Jeremy Leggett in The Guardian – A bright nuclear future: True or False?
So, a broad range of viewpoints on the ‘New Nuclear’ plans – what do you think? Are the Government right to include Nuclear as part of the UK energy mix? Comments welcomed!
Great news in the 



